FW: [afnog] Re: Request for input: The WorkingGrouponInternetGovernance

[Robert.Shaw at itu.int]

;-) ah, false assumption... o.k. make that INCM instead of PTS

and all the more reason to do capacity building with regional
regulator groups to get the policies right to encourage rapid
deployment of ICTs...

> -----Original Message-----
> From: afnog-bounces at afnog.org 
> [mailto:afnog-bounces at afnog.org]On Behalf
> Of Bill Woodcock
> Sent: 18 November 2004 21:49
> To: Shaw, Robert
> Cc: afnog at afnog.org; americo at imit.kth.se
> Subject: RE: FW: [afnog] Re: Request for input: The
> WorkingGrouponInternetGovernance
> 
> 
>       On Thu, 18 Nov 2004 Robert.Shaw at itu.int wrote:
>     > huh? who said that? why do you think we have independent
>     > regulators (like PTS in Sweden) - they're the ones who need
>     > to look after/manage competition in the market. ISPs 
> are not a cottage
>     > industry anymore (Bredbandsbolaget entering 
> TeliaSonera's fixed line
>     > market in your home country being one fine example).
> 
> Actually, Americo's home country would be Mozambique.
> 
>                                 -Bill
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> afnog mailing list
> afnog at afnog.org
> http://listserv2.cfi.co.ug/mailman/listinfo/afnog
>