[afnog] afnog Digest, Vol 54, Issue 23

[Mark Tinka]

On Wednesday 24 September 2008 17:44:50 Frank A. Kuse wrote:

> We were running EIGRP on our internal network but IS-IS
> was the standard for our whole group consideration
> because of its inherent advantages. It's not influence by
> country-wise decision of choosing it as a preferred
> option for running MPLS but it's a whole group decision.

So was IS-IS running fine (particularly between the 2 
routers you were enabling MPLS on) before you decided to 
enable MPLS?

Cheers,

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://afnog.org/pipermail/afnog/attachments/20080924/f4732a9a/attachment-0002.bin>