[afnog] afnog Digest, Vol 54, Issue 23

[Frank A. Kuse]

Hi Mark,

We were running EIGRP on our internal network but IS-IS was the standard for
our whole group consideration because of its inherent advantages.
It's not influence by country-wise decision of choosing it as a preferred
option for running MPLS but it's a whole group decision.
Thanks for asking,

Regards,

Frank A. Kuse

-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Tinka [mailto:mtinka at globaltransit.net] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2008 9:34 AM
To: Frank A. Kuse
Cc: afnog at afnog.org
Subject: Re: [afnog] afnog Digest, Vol 54, Issue 23

On Wednesday 24 September 2008 17:18:29 Frank A. Kuse wrote:

> For now we have reverted all interfaces to be similar but we know that 
> based on what Mark and Peter sent, if we change MTU on the gigabit 
> interface to 1500, mpls works fine.

Just curious, were you running IS-IS as your network's IGP before you
decided to setup MPLS, or did you setup IS-IS with the sole purpose of
running MPLS?

Cheers,

Mark.