[afnog] Problem bringing up MPLS on disimilar interfaces

[Frank A. Kuse]

Hi Mark,

Thanks very much for the link.
This will surely help us in our design consideration.

Cheers,

-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Tinka [mailto:mtinka at globaltransit.net] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2008 4:19 PM
To: Frank A. Kuse
Cc: afnog at afnog.org
Subject: Re: [afnog] Problem bringing up MPLS on disimilar interfaces

On Tuesday 23 September 2008 18:17:36 Frank A. Kuse wrote:

> Thanks very much for your support. MPLS is up and running very well 
> now.

Glad to hear everything is working great!

> The reason of using IS-IS is for future expansion of our network.

I'd suggest taking a closer look at your IS-IS deployment (one of my
suspicions with your LDP problem was the Loopback address wasn't propagating
properly within IS-IS).

I've put up some IS-IS ideas I think would be general best practice on my
blog here:

http://aknit-routing.blogspot.com/2008/06/is-is-routing-protocol-best-practi
ces.html

Have a look when you get a chance and see if there's anything you might find
useful.

Cheers,

Mark.