[afnog] Problem bringing up MPLS on disimilar interfaces

[Mark Tinka]

On Tuesday 23 September 2008 18:17:36 Frank A. Kuse wrote:

> Thanks very much for your support. MPLS is up and running
> very well now.

Glad to hear everything is working great!

> The reason of using IS-IS is for future 
> expansion of our network.

I'd suggest taking a closer look at your IS-IS deployment 
(one of my suspicions with your LDP problem was the 
Loopback address wasn't propagating properly within IS-IS).

I've put up some IS-IS ideas I think would be general best 
practice on my blog here:

http://aknit-routing.blogspot.com/2008/06/is-is-routing-protocol-best-practices.html

Have a look when you get a chance and see if there's 
anything you might find useful.

Cheers,

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://afnog.org/pipermail/afnog/attachments/20080924/283b0e2b/attachment-0002.bin>