[afnog] Fw: Load Balancing btn two ISPs

[Philip Smith]

Just curious.... Why are we looking at such complex solutions when BGP
is well suited to solving this particular problem? ;-)

philip
--

anyuru francis said the following on 19/10/07 16:48:
> 
> 
> Well may be I didn't get it but was thinking that you could do
>  something like Nat on both routers enable GLBP on the ethernet Interfaces.
>  Enable Interface tracking on the serial Interfaces with Premption enabled
>  as shown in the Diagram but still I haven't done that yet so wouldn't be
>  sure 
> 
> Regards 
> 
> Francis 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: Mark Tinka <mtinka at globaltransit.net>
> To: anyuru francis <anyfrancis at yahoo.com>
> Cc: afnog at afnog.org
> Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2007 1:26:28 PM
> Subject: Re: [afnog] Load Balancing btn two ISPs
> 
> 
> On Thursday 18 October 2007 09:06, anyuru francis wrote:
> 
>> Well  I if your routers are both Cisco GLBP would be an
>> ideal solution for you or you could use pfsense with two
>> interfaces I think it can do load balancing with round
>> robin but GLBP can do unequal load balancing.
> 
> AFAIK, GLBP is only supported on IEEE 802.3 interfaces, 
> i.e., Ethernet.
> 
> The OP's situation refers to E1-type interfaces (PPP, HDLC, 
> e.t.c.).
> 
> Mark.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
> http://mail.yahoo.com 
> 
> 
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
> http://mail.yahoo.com 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> afnog mailing list
> http://afnog.org/mailman/listinfo/afnog