[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: IP OVER ATM

To: "'Modou Salifu Jatta'" <msjatta at gamtel.gm>
Subject: RE: IP OVER ATM
From: Bill Woodcock <woody at pch.net>
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2003 04:53:15 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: afnog at afnog.org
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: afnog-archive at lists.eahd.or.ug
Delivered-To: afnog-outgoing at afnog.org
Delivered-To: afnog at afnog.org
In-Reply-To: <00a401c3299d$5297a4e0$f50ab00a at afol.co.ug>
Sender: owner-afnog at afnog.org

    > My company is planning to deploy IP OVER ATM but am not very comfortable
    > about it.Well if any one has experience with ATM I would be grateful for any
    > advice with regards to scalability and future prospects of the technology.

Why ATM rather than frame relay?

                                -Bill



-----
This is the afnog mailing list, managed by Majordomo 1.94.5

To send a message to this list, e-mail afnog at afnog.org
To send a request to majordomo, e-mail majordomo at afnog.org and put
your request in the body of the message (i.e use "help" for help)

This list is maintained by owner-afnog at afnog.org

References:
- RE: IP OVER ATM
  - From: "Mark Tinka" <mtinka at africaonline.co.ug>

Prev by Date: Re: IP OVER ATM
Next by Date: Re: Fwd: [secsac] cctld deligation review
Prev by thread: Re: IP OVER ATM
Next by thread: Re: IP OVER ATM
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread