[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
forwarded msg. Geoff Huston <gih at telstra.net>
- To: afnog at afnog.org
- Subject: forwarded msg. Geoff Huston <gih at telstra.net>
- From: Charles Musisi <cmusisi at cfi.co.ug>
- Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2003 12:47:15 +0300
- Content-Type: multipart/mixed; x-avg-checked=avg-ok-27FC5BFC; boundary="=======4754BD4======="
- Delivered-To: afnog-archive at lists.eahd.or.ug
- Delivered-To: afnog-outgoing at afnog.org
- Delivered-To: afnog at afnog.org
- Sender: owner-afnog at afnog.org
ate: Wed, 16 Apr 2003 19:44:09 +1000
To: Joe Joe <yhovluv at yahoo.com>, Brian Candler <B.Candler at pobox.com>
From: Geoff Huston <gih at telstra.net>
Subject: Re: BGP over satellite link
Cc: afnog at afnog.org
In-Reply-To: <20030406153029.78641.qmail at web20713.mail.yahoo.com>
References: <20030405132139.GA12180 at uk.tiscali.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Does this help?
http://www.potaroo.net/ispcolumn/2000-03-simplex.html
Geoff
At 08:30 AM 4/6/2003 -0700, Joe Joe wrote:
> >How exactly do you mean "we are not directly connected?" Normally you would
> >have a border router which connects to the leased line or satellite link,
> >and at the other end of the link is your provider's border router. If this
> >is not what you are intending to have, can you draw an ASCII diagram?
>I am connected via a satellite link (SCPC/DVB). I have my border router
>and definitely does my provider as well.
>
> >Well, this is by agreement with your provider. Normally it makes sense to
> >use your router interface IP (typically assigned by your provider as a /30
> >subnet). This is so that if the link fails, the BGP keepalives will fail to
> >get through. BGP will thus notice the failed link, withdraw the routes, and
> >your traffic will get rerouted via your other provider. You don't want the
> >BGP session between yourself and provider A to be re-routed via
provider B's
> >link!
>
>I dont have a /30 between me and my provider. I have my own address space.
>Is the bgp multihop option not a good choice for my config settings?? If
>it is, is it best to use my IP interface address or loopback address?
>
>thanks
>
>J.
>
> Brian Candler <B.Candler at pobox.com> wrote:
>On Sat, Apr 05, 2003 at 04:04:28AM -0800, Joe Joe wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm a newbie on this list.
>
>Welcome!
>
> > I need to run BGP with my upstream provider
> > because I will be multihomed to another provider, since we are not
> > directly connected, how do I go about the config.
>
>How exactly do you mean "we are not directly connected?" Normally you would
>have a border router which connects to the leased line or satellite link,
>and at the other end of the link is your provider's border router. If this
>is not what you are intending to have, can you draw an ASCII diagram?
>
> > Secondly, am I to
> > use my router interface IP address or the loopback address to run the
> > BGP session with my upstream.
>
>Well, this is by agreement with your provider. Normally it makes sense to
>use your router interface IP ! (typically assigned by your provider as a /30
>subnet). This is so that if the link fails, the BGP keepalives will fail to
>get through. BGP will thus notice the failed link, withdraw the routes, and
>your traffic will get rerouted via your other provider. You don't want the
>BGP session between yourself and provider A to be re-routed via provider B's
>link!
>
>However, if I remember correctly, BGP sets an IP TTL of 1 on its packets
>anyway by default, so it should work even if you use a loopback address. In
>that case it will try to reroute the BGP packets via provider B, but because
>provider A's router is more than one hop away when reached via provider B,
>the BGP session between you and provider A will still fail when the link
>goes down.
>
>It can be preferential to use a loopback address in some cases, for example
>if you are running two 2M links in parallel to the same far-end router to
>simulate a 4M link:
>
>serial0 2M
>,-----! -----------.
>you provider
>`----------------'
>serial1 2M
>In this case, you do want the BGP session to stay up even if one of the two
>2M lines goes down, so you run it between loopbacks, with static routes to
>the loopback address of the far-end router. If both 2M lines are up, the
>routers will round-robin the traffic between them.
>
>Regards,
>
>Brian.
>
>
>
>Do you Yahoo!?
><http://us.rd.yahoo.com/finance/mailsig/*http://tax.yahoo.com>Yahoo! Tax
>Center - File online, calculators, forms, and more