[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Cisco access list - multihomed question
- To: afnog at afnog.org
- Subject: Cisco access list - multihomed question
- From: Brian Longwe <blongwe at psg.com>
- Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2001 18:17:31 +0300
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
- Delivered-To: afnog-archive at lists.eahd.or.ug
- Delivered-To: <afnog at afnog.org>
- Sender: owner-afnog at uol.co.ug
Hi,
The scenario.
- Two upstream circuits on the same border router
- I want to use one to carry (outgoing) traffic for certain customer networks only
- I want to use the other as the standard default for all other customer traffic
Upst #1 s0/0 [---------]
--------------------[ ]< Upst #1 should route traffic for x.y.z.0/25
[ ]
--------------------[ ]
Upst #2 s1/0:16 [---------]< Upst #2 should route traffic for all others
- Both upstream connections go to the same provider
- There is no BGP with upstream provider, only static defaults (until now)
Instinctively I want to define route-maps to block traffic for #2 from #1 and block traffic for #1 from #2 with a "next-hop" statement to redirect in each route-map.
Is this the right logic? Anyone with similar experience who can give tips?
Thanks,
Brian Longwe
-----
This is the afnog mailing list, managed by Majordomo 1.94.4
To send a message to this list, e-mail afnog at afnog.org
To send a request to majordomo, e-mail majordomo at afnog.org and put
your request in the body of the message (i.e use "help" for help)
This list is maintained by owner-afnog at afnog.org