[afnog] afnog Digest, Vol 60, Issue 13

[Global One Solutions]

Thomas,

I will review the draft and provide you a feedback, but i can speak on US
peering point, currently almost all the major Tier 1 ISP have private
relationship and don't bother configuring CoS on their peering link, and due
to 40Gig, and soon 100Gig ports, they can provision new circuit  as neeeded.
I have seen CoS on MPLS peering, I would like to hear others on IXP
connection, and if they see any benefit using some sort of CoS


Thanks,


On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 8:00 AM, <afnog-request at afnog.org> wrote:

> Send afnog mailing list submissions to
>        afnog at afnog.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>        http://afnog.org/mailman/listinfo/afnog
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>        afnog-request at afnog.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>        afnog-owner at afnog.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of afnog digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>   1.  Traffic separation between ASes (Thomas M. Knoll)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 00:14:28 +0100 (MET)
> From: "Thomas M. Knoll" <knoll at etit.tu-chemnitz.de>
> Subject: [afnog] Traffic separation between ASes
> To: afnog at afnog.org
> Message-ID:
>        <alpine.LRH.2.00.0903270006500.27056 at tor.hrz.tu-chemnitz.de>
> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII
>
> Dear Sirs,
>
> excuse me please for bothering you with the following information, but I
> thought it could be of use for you as well.
>
> Increasing Internet traffic and the transfer of delay and loss critical
> traffic may lead to congested interconnection links and dropping of the
> "wrong" packets as a result.
> This is particularly regrettable, if the interconnected partners both use
> traffic differentiation in their networks and are cut back to best effort
> interconnection (p2p or through IXPs).
>
> I have proposed a concept for simple Inter-AS Class of Service
> interconnection that allows for consistent traffic separation even across
> interconnection points.
>
> By means of this email, I would like to receive your feedback, whether the
> described situation is currently seen or expected in the next months.
> Furthermore, I would be interested to hear, whether there have already
> been set up class of service based interconnections, which could make us
> of such an automated CoS signalling concept.
>
> Background information about the proposed and implemented concept can be
> found at:
> http://www3.ietf.org/proceedings/09mar/slides/idr-5.pdf
> and
>
> http://www.ripe.net/ripe/meetings/ripe-57/presentations/Knoll-Traffic_Categorisation_and_Inter-AS_Peering.pdf
>
> Thank you in advance,
> Thomas Knoll
> --
> +---------------------------------------------------------+
> + Thomas M. Knoll                                         +
> + Chemnitz University                                     +
> + of Technology              Ph. : +49 (0)371 531 33246   +
> + Reichenhainer Str. 70      Fax : +49 (0)371 531 833246  +
> + Room 331                                                +
> + 09107 Chemnitz                                          +
> + GERMANY                                                 +
> + WWW    : http://www.tu-chemnitz.de/~tkn<http://www.tu-chemnitz.de/%7Etkn>                +
> + E-Mail : knoll at etit.tu-chemnitz.de                      +
> +---------------------------------------------------------+
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> afnog mailing list
>
> End of afnog Digest, Vol 60, Issue 13
> *************************************
>



-- 
Liban Mohamed
Global One Solution
www.globalonesolutions.net
CCIE#22493
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://afnog.org/pipermail/afnog/attachments/20090328/de4ed7f2/attachment-0001.html>