[afnog] Signing root zone
bortzmeyer at nic.fr
Fri Nov 7 07:59:49 UTC 2008
On Thu, Nov 06, 2008 at 08:11:19AM -0800,
Bill Woodcock <woody at pch.net> wrote
a message of 8 lines which said:
> This isn't a question of whether the root zone should be signed
> anymore. It's a question of who holds control over the process.
For the people who missed the *proposed* RIPE statement (posted here
by McTim), do note it says exactly the opposite: the statement does
not choose between the different proposals (all are technically
correct, after all) and it emphasizes that issues about control should
not delay the signing of the root.
But I agree with you that the real problem is of control, even if
everyone denies it.
More information about the afnog