[afnog] Routage dynamiquement (Urgreant)

[Joe Abley]

On 19-Dec-2006, at 09:51, Mohamed Lemine Ould Mohamed Vadel wrote:

> Mes questions sont les suivantes:
>
> 1- peut on implanter un routage dynamique pour ce client (en  
> conservant les
> deux pooles : la notre et celle de l'autre opérateur) ?
>
> 2- Si oui, comment faire de mon coté et du coté client?

Il pourrait être utile de lire RFC4116:

   http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4116.txt

particulièrement section 3.1.1.2:

3.1.1.2.  PA Addresses

    The site uses PA addresses assigned by a single transit provider.
    The set of routes covering those PA addresses (the "site route set")
    is announced or propagated by one or more additional transit
    providers.  The transit provider which assigned the PA addresses  
(the
    "primary transit provider") originates a set of routes which cover
    the site route set.  The primary transit provider often  
originates or
    propagates the site route set as well as the covering aggregates.

    The use of PA addresses is applicable to sites whose addressing
    requirements are not sufficient to meet the requirements for PI
    assignments by RIRs.  However, in the case where the site route set
    is to be announced or propagated by two or more different transit
    providers, common operational practice still dictates minimum /24
    prefixes, which may be larger than the allocation available to small
    sites.

    [...]


Joe