[afnog] NAT'ing (was Mikrotik Router Help)

[Mark Tinka]

On Tuesday 28 June 2005 12:38, Michuki Mwangi wrote:

> Am not 100% certain that the ISPs responsibility ends
> there. IMHO, its in our place to advise these
> organizations/corporates on the pros and cons of NAT.
> In the same breath we advise them on BCPs for mail
> systems and security.

Agree, of course the service provider should and must 
always inform the customer of their options. But having 
pros and cons means the decision could go either way, 
and I think it's the ISP's job to help identify the 
right choice for the end user given their (unique) 
situation.

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 827 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://listserv2.cfi.co.ug/mailman/private/afnog/attachments/20050628/1b444720/attachment.bin