[afnog] Mikrotik Router Help

[Mark Tinka]

On Tuesday 28 June 2005 10:07, Michuki Mwangi wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-06-27 at 20:51, Sunday A Folayan wrote:
> >  No amount of talk could convince them of the folly
> > of
> >
> > >this approach.
> >
> > Introduce them to Adiel. He needs to evangelize
> > them.
>
> SF, you ought to put out the presentation you made at
> AfNOG 2004 on NATs are evil! :)

I don't think NAT'ing is evil, per se - just where and 
how you use NAT is what would make it seem (less) evil.

As an ISP, with the power to have as many IP's as your 
network requires, unnecessarily NAT'ing your customers 
may be questionable.

However, if you can assign your customers routable IP's, 
it's at their discretion whether and how they perform 
NAT for their (corporate) network.

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 827 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://listserv2.cfi.co.ug/mailman/private/afnog/attachments/20050628/b44da025/attachment.bin